threatened" which "is that indispensable element of a dispute which serves in part to cast it in a form traditionally capable of judicial resolution."  Schlesinger v. Reservists Committee to Stop the War, 418 U.S. 208, 220-21 (1974).
Here, all Newdow alleged is an injury he holds in common with other members of the public: an objection to the recitation of a prayer at the presidential inauguration.  His "injury" is no different than the ideological injury millions of other atheists and non-Christians may have experienced on January 20, 2001, and is insufficiently "concrete and particularized" to establish standing.  Yet, under the Magistrate Judge's broad view of standing, every person in the United States who viewed the inaugural activities--potentially many millions of viewers--could file a suit similar to Newdow's.  But the specter of millions of suits being brought in the 94 federal judicial districts underscores the need for the requirement that a plaintiff suf