1	references to Jesus are acceptable? Is one acceptable, but two
2	violate the Establishment Clause? Did the invocation contain too
3	many references to Christian beliefs? For every reference to a
4	Christian belief must there be a certain number of references to
5	God so as not to appear "too Christian? Any attempt by this
6	Court to establish approved standards for an inaugural invocation
7	would drag this Court into a quagmire from which it could not
8	escape, and would undoubtedly result in the excessive
9	entanglement of the Court with religious beliefs in clear
10	violation of Lemon v. Kurtman, 403 U.S. 602, 612-13 (1971) .
11	Moreover, the Supreme Court's decision in Lee v. Weisman,
12	505 U.S. 577 (1991), confirms that Marsh remains good law. In
13	Lee, the Court reaffirmed Marsh and observed that "£i]n Marsh, we
14	upheld the constitutionality of the Nebraska State
15	Legislature's practice of opening each of its sessions with a
16	prayer offered by a chaplain paid out of public funds." Id. at
17	585. Significantly, the Court in Lee neither overruled Marsh nor
18	said anything to suggest that Marsh had been overruled
19	previously. On the contrary, because Marsh is still the law, the
20	Court was forced to distinguish Marsh from the facts before it.
21	See id. at 597.
22	Unless and until Marsh is expressly overruled, it remains
23	the law of the land and should be followed.
25  B.   The Establishment Clause Does Not Prevent A Private Citizen From Delivering A Prayer At A Government Ceremony.
26
27       It is undisputed that Rev. Graham is a private citizen who
28  was not paid with government funds to attend the inauguration;
3