1	prohibited side of what may be said at good and legal inaugurations. The court should decline to
2	consider such advisory declaratory relief.2
3	B. Reconsideration of the Findings and Recommendations
4	Because substitution of Senator McConnell or any other Inauguration associated
5	person or entity would not affect the undersigned's recommendation for dismissal, the December
6	28, 2001 Findings and Recommendations, as supplemented herein, are again respectfully
7	submitted for Judge Kariton's review.
8	Conclusion
9	Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Newdow's motion to amend the
10	complaint is denied.
11	IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that the case be dismissed with prejudice.
12	These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District
13	Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within ten days
14	after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written
15	objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned
16	"Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Any reply to the objections
17	shall be served and filed within five days after service of the objections. The parties are advised
18	that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District
19	\\\\\
20	\\\\\
21	\\\\\
22
23         2 In an eleventh hour pleading filed the day before hearing, and in an act of apparent "standing desperation," Newdow stated that he would seek to amend to name the ushers and
24 other support personnel at the Inauguration, or the United States itself. Clearly, joining the
ushers or program vendors etc. would not bring Newdow effective relief, nor is there a waiver of
25 sovereign immunity for an injunctive relief suit against the United States. The principles
requiring dismissal of this lawsuit will not be overcome at this point by naming a multitude of
26 defendants.